Spam Filter ISP Forums : EnableWebServer=1 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/ Mon, 20 Apr 2026 11:58:54 +0000 Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:30:42 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 11.04 360 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=5753 <![CDATA[Spam Filter ISP Forums]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_images/web_wiz_forums.png https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/ <![CDATA[EnableWebServer=1 : Roberto, just some feedback on...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8739&title=enablewebserver1#8739 Author: sgeorge
Subject: 5753
Posted: 16 August 2006 at 11:30am

Roberto, just some feedback on the internal web server...

I recently purchased the registered version of SpamFilter, and found the  SpamFilter Config Settings web server to be helpful.  I still use the "mstsc -console" command most of the time in order to Remote Desktop to SpamFilter; but the config web site allows me to securely (via https :]) change settings at times when other administrators are trying to make use of the server at the same time.

Thanks, it's handy.  I imagine it probably takes quite a bit of upkeep work to update the SpamFilter application GUI and the web interface for every single build of SpamFilter.  I understand if it become overwhelming to maintain... but I do want to let you know that it is appreciated.

Stephen
]]> Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:30:42 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8739&title=enablewebserver1#8739 <![CDATA[EnableWebServer=1 : Database logging would make this...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8725&title=enablewebserver1#8725 Author: StevenJohns
Subject: 5753
Posted: 14 August 2006 at 4:02am

Database logging would make this so much easier...a simple sql query, rather than trawling through text files....

However, I presume that SF must keep track of the recipients that are valid for any given email, as it must need this info to issue to the smtp server that it forwards the email to. Therefore I couls get the valid recipients from my smtp server after SF has forwarded it??

 

 

]]> Mon, 14 Aug 2006 04:02:34 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8725&title=enablewebserver1#8725 <![CDATA[EnableWebServer=1 : Unfortunately the log is the only...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8723&title=enablewebserver1#8723 Author: LogSat
Subject: 5753
Posted: 13 August 2006 at 6:43pm

Unfortunately the log is the only way... at least with SpamFilter and the headers it (doesn't) add .


]]> Sun, 13 Aug 2006 18:43:38 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8723&title=enablewebserver1#8723 <![CDATA[EnableWebServer=1 : Ah, I have a situation where I...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8722&title=enablewebserver1#8722 Author: StevenJohns
Subject: 5753
Posted: 13 August 2006 at 5:58pm

Ah, I have a situation where I need to apply an accept ro reject filter on an email which is delivered to multiple recipients. However, only some of the recipients want to recieve the email, while others want to decline it.

One man's ham is another man's spam !!!

Have you any idea how I could get the RCPT recipients, other than trawling through the log for each email recieved ?

Cheers

]]> Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:58:23 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8722&title=enablewebserver1#8722 <![CDATA[EnableWebServer=1 : Yes, correct in everything.As...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8721&title=enablewebserver1#8721 Author: LogSat
Subject: 5753
Posted: 13 August 2006 at 5:53pm

Yes, correct in everything.

As indeed the headers are different, SpamFilter indicates in a custom "X-SF-RX-Return-Path:" the address used in the MAIL FROM.

There isn't however any indication on the RCPT TO. We can't add anything to identify these in custom headers, as if we did, emails with multiple recipients would be delivered with all the recipients visible in the headers. This would be quite a privacy problem, especially with emails from listservers, distribution lists, and blind copy recipients.

]]> Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:53:55 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8721&title=enablewebserver1#8721 <![CDATA[EnableWebServer=1 : Roberto, A quick question. Am...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8719&title=enablewebserver1#8719 Author: StevenJohns
Subject: 5753
Posted: 13 August 2006 at 5:27pm

Roberto,

A quick question.

Am I right in thinking that if I delete the quarantine database connection string, and then thee SF to "Tag Spam & Deliver", that it will tag all spam with a header (and not in the subject), and will deliver all email to the configured SMTP server.?

If this is the case, how do I find out what the "MAIL FROM:" and "RCPT TO:" smtp commands were, as these often bear no relationto the "From:" and "To:" headers within the mail.

cheers

]]> Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:27:50 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8719&title=enablewebserver1#8719 <![CDATA[EnableWebServer=1 : no problem ]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8718&title=enablewebserver1#8718 Author: LogSat
Subject: 5753
Posted: 13 August 2006 at 5:19pm

no problem ]]> Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:19:06 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8718&title=enablewebserver1#8718 <![CDATA[EnableWebServer=1 : Absolutely true, I skip read the...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8717&title=enablewebserver1#8717 Author: StevenJohns
Subject: 5753
Posted: 13 August 2006 at 5:09pm

Absolutely true, I skip read the previous post.

Sorry, my mistake.

]]> Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:09:05 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8717&title=enablewebserver1#8717 <![CDATA[EnableWebServer=1 : ... I didn&#039;t say 99% capture...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8716&title=enablewebserver1#8716 Author: LogSat
Subject: 5753
Posted: 13 August 2006 at 9:10am

... I didn't say 99% capture rate, I said:

99.9% of SpamFilter's upgrades require simply stopping SpamFilter,copying the two updated .exe files, and restarting SpamFilter.
]]> Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:10:59 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8716&title=enablewebserver1#8716 <![CDATA[EnableWebServer=1 : No problen, you have to design...]]> https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8715&title=enablewebserver1#8715 Author: StevenJohns
Subject: 5753
Posted: 13 August 2006 at 5:48am

No problen, you have to design it as you see fit, it just means that we have to then wriote our oun code to overcome your "features" and get it to work the way we need it.

I do agree that SF is quite good. I cannot comment on the performance with 50,000 emails a day,but I can comment on the 99% bit.

We are not seeing 99% capture at all....I will do the maths and get some real life results to you.

 

]]> Sun, 13 Aug 2006 05:48:32 +0000 https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=5753&PID=8715&title=enablewebserver1#8715