New Reject Code
Printed From: LogSat Software
Category: Spam Filter ISP
Forum Name: Spam Filter ISP Support
Forum Description: General support for Spam Filter ISP
URL: https://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6363
Printed Date: 14 March 2025 at 5:44pm
Topic: New Reject Code
Posted By: Desperado
Subject: New Reject Code
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 10:49am
|
OK ... I know this effects a lot of users custom apps but ... is it even remotely possible to break the Local IP Black List away from the MAPS rejection? I have a custom rejection code just so my GUI can search in the "Rejection Details" field but this is not as efficient or easy as having it's own RejectID. There are other small reasons that only apply to me but, even so.
ADDED:9:20PM: My reject is "521 5.2 The IP ....." That is how I can search for that exact "Cause". However, I would still like to search for a Reject ID.
Any thoughts from anyone? ------------- The Desperado Dan Seligmann. Work: http://www.mags.net Personal: http://www.desperado.com |
Replies:
Posted By: jerbo128
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 7:39pm
|
I will second that motion. It would be very helpful to us also.
Yes, we could go through the log files, but even with sawmill, processing 300-400MB of log files per day takes a long time.
So, PLEASE
 All in favor - say AYE
Jeremy
|
Posted By: IKILLSPAM1
Date Posted: 04 February 2008 at 3:49pm
| AYE |
Posted By: LogSat
Date Posted: 04 February 2008 at 6:14pm
|
This one we may actually have a problem implementing. Not because it's complicated (it's not....) but because we would risk breaking many applications/reports that various admins may have in place. We may create some kind of setting that will allow you admins to choose if to change the ID for one of the two filters, we're brainstorming on how to proceed.... ------------- Roberto Franceschetti http://www.logsat.com" rel="nofollow - LogSat Software http://www.logsat.com/sfi-spam-filter.asp" rel="nofollow - Spam Filter ISP |
Posted By: Desperado
Date Posted: 05 February 2008 at 11:39am
|
Thanks. Let us know. ------------- The Desperado Dan Seligmann. Work: http://www.mags.net Personal: http://www.desperado.com |
Posted By: mbrusl
Date Posted: 06 February 2008 at 12:56am
Could this be something that can be hashed out here with all the participating SF users. Maybe sending out a blanketed email to the registered users to chime in on this one and have a real discussion to get this resolved. My guess would be that as long as everyone knows about it, they would be in a better position to be ready for a possibly change when it happens. As for maybe those that want to run it as a test first before implementing it into a production environment, I'd be willing to go that route. Then if it doesn't work for a smooth transition, then we'd have our answer for sure. ------------- Michael support@spacequad.com If blocked, use spacequad@hotmail.com Spacequad Internet Services Spacequad AntiSpam Services Thunder Bay, Ontario -------------------------------------------------- |
LogSat wrote: