LogSat Software

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   Here are a couple of features we would like to see in newer realeases of SF. 
An ability to block HTML formatted emails would be nice. I think we could do this with a body filter of <html> but I would like something a little more robust.
On the same note, I know some other products offer the ability to send cusotmized rejection messages. This would be incredibly helpful for instances like a denial of an html message. A reply like 'Your email was rejected because it is formatted in HTML, please reformat in plain text and send again.' would make false positives far easier to diagnose and far less hands on for IT. 
Finally, an update utility would be well recieved here. I think that having a common filter method among all user of spam filter, and having a central source to continually update those filters would help. It would, of course, need to append the filters, and not erase personal settings added by individuals, but regular updates would help cut our downtime.
Randall Sanborn

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
Randall Sanborn Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Guest Group	Post Options Post Reply Quote Randall Sanborn Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: New Features Posted: 23 June 2004 at 12:42pm
	Here are a couple of features we would like to see in newer realeases of SF. An ability to block HTML formatted emails would be nice. I think we could do this with a body filter of <html> but I would like something a little more robust. On the same note, I know some other products offer the ability to send cusotmized rejection messages. This would be incredibly helpful for instances like a denial of an html message. A reply like 'Your email was rejected because it is formatted in HTML, please reformat in plain text and send again.' would make false positives far easier to diagnose and far less hands on for IT. Finally, an update utility would be well recieved here. I think that having a common filter method among all user of spam filter, and having a central source to continually update those filters would help. It would, of course, need to append the filters, and not erase personal settings added by individuals, but regular updates would help cut our downtime. Randall Sanborn

LogSat Software

Site Navigation[Skip]

Spam Filter ISP Support Forum

New Features