Corpus Feature Request |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
kspare ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 334 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 26 January 2004 at 10:29am |
Hey guys, I have been doing more thinking and found some more problems/ideas with the corpus. The problem I have found is that while I run 2 spam filter servers, one just being redundant in the event the main one goes down, it gets very little mail because the main server is up, and what mail doesn come through is 99% spam. So if the main server does go down basically we loose the entire functionality of the corpus. Here's my idea to the solution. I know Roberto said SQL etc is not fast enough, so what if the corpus was stored/synced to the spamfilter database and each spamfilter server cached a copy of it locally? Have a setting to allow users a duration to have spamfilter sync to the database.... That would solve all of our problems for people who run redundant spamfitler servers. Is this possible? |
|
![]() |
|
dcook ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 31 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 174 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Great idea -- I would like my two SF servers to share information on the corpus stats also. It seems that this would ge a great canidate for XML? Dwight |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.