MAPS and SURBL servers suggestion |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
LogSat 
Admin Group 
Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: MAPS and SURBL servers suggestionPosted: 10 November 2015 at 6:23pm |
|
A very good suggestion was made by one of our users to keep a sticky thread on the forum with a list of our suggestions for the MAPS and SURBL servers to be used in SpamFilter. We'll also keep the thread open for everyone to contribute.
For the MAPS servers, this is our current suggestion: bl.spamcop.net, true cbl.abuseat.org, true zen.spamhaus.org, true dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net, true The last server from uceprotect.net can be a bit too aggressive for some users - only by testing it out you will find out if it's a good fit to your environment. For the SURBL servers, this is the only one we use in our own live servert: multi.surbl.org |
|
 |
|
|
yapadu
Senior Member 
Joined: 12 May 2005 Status: Offline Points: 297 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2016 at 8:01pm |
|
In case anyone cares, according to this page cbl.abuseat.org is included in zen.spamhaus.org so you do not need to make calls to cbl.abuseat.org if you are using zen.
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
I am a user of SF, not an employee. Use any advice offered at your own risk. |
|
|
|
|
Garand
Newbie 
Joined: 19 October 2017 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 October 2017 at 3:47am |
|
That's a good suggestion indeed. I'm testing that server currently, still not decided if it fits my needs.
|
|
|
|
|
yapadu
Senior Member
Joined: 12 May 2005 Status: Offline Points: 297 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 April 2018 at 10:27pm |
|
Just ran some performance numbers, when Spamhaus contacted us regarding renewing their service - with a major price jump.
Here are some lists we use and the false positive rates we see with each. Invaluement - .20% Spamhaus - .07% SpamCop - 0.88% UCE Protect - 1.75% Clearly, Spamhaus has the lowest false positive rates. We offer UCE Protect to customers who want to increase their level of protection at the risk of higher false positives and clearly they do have a much higher false positives rate. If you use a list and have good results, please post it here. How about the false positive rates of some other filters??? SFDE - 0.76% SFDB - 0.09% SPF Filter - 1.09% (this one always has a high false positive rate) |
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
I am a user of SF, not an employee. Use any advice offered at your own risk. |
|
|
|
Topic Options|
Post Reply
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.160 seconds.