Who has a big spamfilter install? |
Post Reply |
Author | |
yapadu
Senior Member Joined: 12 May 2005 Status: Offline Points: 297 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 24 February 2009 at 7:43am |
I've always wondered how big an install SF can be used for. I seem to recall one user on here saying they had 20,000 domains which I thought was impressive.
If you have a big one, in terms of domains or messages per day please post your numbers. If you don't mind sharing what type of hardware you use to do it that would be nice as well. I'm currently one of the smallest, and lowest volume users out there... but I hope to change that soon and would like to know what I can expect with a large number of domains / messages. Thanks! Edited by yapadu - 26 February 2009 at 8:38pm |
|
ImInAfrica
Groupie Joined: 27 June 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 60 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
yapadu,
you must remember that the number of domains won't necessarily mean a lot of emails. we run SF with over 4,500 domains. one primary, one secondary (running on VMWare). granted most of these domains are dormant, or don't even receive mail, but due to the nature of our setup we can't tell who does, and who doesn't (we're in the reseller market). Here are some stats since about Jan 2007 for our primary MX: total inbound connections: 206,081,880 email forwarded: 69,575,871 emails blocked: 81,122,647 email attempts: 133,759,396 during the day we have an average of 50 concurrent connections. these are stats for secondary MX which get much more spam. these are from about Jun 2007 total inbound connections: 252,058,935 email forwarded: 40,661,683 emails blocked: 88,951,851 email attempts: 120,553,366 We had instances were we refused service to some customers, simply due to their email volume, and their refusal to pay more for the service. i don't think SF has any problems with the number of domains. you should be looking at the number of concurrent connections you're going to run. although i must say that ever since the implementation of the grey filtering, we've seen a reduction is resources used on the servers. good luck Amir |
|
yapadu
Senior Member Joined: 12 May 2005 Status: Offline Points: 297 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi Amir,
Thanks for the feedback, nice to see some numbers. I'm currently ramping up to start a service of providing SPAM protection using SF. I have two servers online, one of which will need to be upgraded if the service takes off. Server #1 (will also host mysql database) Windows 2008 Server Pentium E 2.0Ghz, Dual Core 2GB RAM Server #2 Windows 2003 Server Pentium III 930Mhz (dual CPU, feel the power!) 650 Meg RAM Obviously serer #2 will have to be upgraded, but will be interesting to see what a little machine like this will be able to process. Anyone else want to share some numbers or specs? |
|
ImInAfrica
Groupie Joined: 27 June 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 60 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
you'll quickly realize that the "little" machine if setup as a secondary will be processing MUCH more spam then the primary.
just the way spammers work. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.