Spam Filter ISP Support Forum

  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Whitelisting using CIDR?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Whitelisting using CIDR?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
yapadu View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 May 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 297
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote yapadu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Whitelisting using CIDR?
    Posted: 17 January 2020 at 10:54pm
I'm trying to do whitelisting by CIDR, like this:

209.85.222.0/16

Doesn't seem to have any impact.

I found a VERY old thread where using CIDR was talked about for blacklisting


However, I've found nothing about whitelisting using a CIDR.  Can anyone confirm, if it is supported or not?  Or am I just doing something wrong?
--------------------------------------------------------------
I am a user of SF, not an employee. Use any advice offered at your own risk.
Back to Top
LogSat View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 25 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4104
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LogSat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 January 2020 at 5:20pm
Sorry yapadu,

The CIDR notation is only available in the IP blacklist, not in the whitelist. However... In the IP whitelist you can for example enter this wildcarded entry for the /16 subnet:

192.168.*

Note that the above notation will only block 192.168.0.0 --> 192.168.255.255. It will not interfere with substrings (IPs that contain 192.168 in them), for example it will *not* block:
1.192.168.2

Roberto Franceschetti

LogSat Software

Spam Filter ISP
Back to Top
yapadu View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 May 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 297
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote yapadu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2020 at 7:53pm
Oh, you can use a wildcard a low as the 3rd octet?

So these would be valid?

192.168.*
192.168.2*
192.168.12*

192.168.2.*
192.168.2.1*

All those would be OK?
--------------------------------------------------------------
I am a user of SF, not an employee. Use any advice offered at your own risk.
Back to Top
LogSat View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 25 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4104
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LogSat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2020 at 10:15pm
Yes correct - it will work even for the first octet (192.*).

Roberto Franceschetti

LogSat Software

Spam Filter ISP
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.