Tag Spam ?? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
jerbo128 ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 March 2006 Status: Offline Points: 178 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 23 June 2007 at 9:18pm |
Running SFE .679. If all users are setup to quarantine, and 2 of them have the :tagsubject in the unfiltered emails list, what should happen to an incoming email with multiple recipients? What is happening: Any idea's? |
|
![]() |
|
LogSat ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Could you either post or email us a section of SpamFilter's activity logfile showing a couple of minutes prior to one of the emails in question, including entries for a couple of minutes after? In SpamFilter 3.5.3.679 we actually (should have) fixed an issue very similar to yours:
// New to VersionNumber = '3.5.3.679'; {TODO -cFix : The :tag and :tagsubject were incorrectly tagging emails with multiple recipients} {TODO -cFix : Emails blocked by the attachment filter were stored in the quarantine DB with a rejectID of 13 instead of 23} {TODO -cFix : Added 100ms delay when saving corpus database files to try avoiding error "corpus.db copy of files not exist - exiting"} {TODO -cNew : Added customized response item for emails rejected by the Honeypot filters} We'd like to see the logs so we can try to pinpoint what is happening and why the above fix did not work. |
|
![]() |
|
jerbo128 ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 March 2006 Status: Offline Points: 178 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Logs Sent. Thanks Roberto. |
|
![]() |
|
LogSat ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
jerbo128,
Your email sample involved a very particular set of circumstance. There is indeed a bug (actually two, including a logging inaccuracy), even though it occurs in a very specific scenario such as yours. I'll try to explain.
Below I'm including the entire SMTP session for the
email in question. You will see that in the same SMTP session, the spammer is
sending multiple, separate emails, all to separate
recipients.
06/22/07 02:09:39:078 -- (3924) Connection
from: 211.138.9.114 - Originating country : China
06/22/07 02:09:43:562 -- (3924) - IP address is from a blacklisted country... The 1st email starts here... 06/22/07 02:09:43:562 -- (3924)
211.138.9.114 - Mail from: cglew@cablecomponents.com To: adolphson@Your_Domain.net will be
rejected
06/22/07 02:09:44:609 -- (3924) Mail from: cglew@cablecomponents.com 06/22/07 02:09:44:609 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: cglew@cablecomponents.com To: adreyer@Your_Domain.net will be rejected 06/22/07 02:09:45:906 -- (3924) Mail from: cglew@cablecomponents.com 06/22/07 02:09:45:906 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: cglew@cablecomponents.com To: aeitzen@Your_Domain.net will be rejected 06/22/07 02:09:47:703 -- (3924) Mail from: cglew@cablecomponents.com ..... omissis 06/22/07 02:10:00:812 -- (3924) Mail from:
cglew@cablecomponents.com
06/22/07 02:10:00:812 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: cglew@cablecomponents.com To: amyjo@Your_Domain.net will be rejected 06/22/07 02:10:02:484 -- (3924) Start virus scan 06/22/07 02:10:02:484 -- (3924) Starting bayesian procedures This is the end of the 1st email , all the rejections are as they should be. The 2nd email starts here, the spammer uses a
different MAIL FROM addres...
06/22/07 02:10:04:109 -- (3924) Mail from:
crobbins@robbinsent.com
06/22/07 02:10:04:109 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: crobbins@robbinsent.com To: andersonj@Your_Domain.net will be rejected 06/22/07 02:10:04:781 -- (3924) Mail from: crobbins@robbinsent.com 06/22/07 02:10:04:781 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: crobbins@robbinsent.com To: andy@Your_Domain.net will be rejected 06/22/07 02:10:05:375 -- (3924) Mail from: crobbins@robbinsent.com 06/22/07 02:10:05:375 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: crobbins@robbinsent.com To: andyfarmer@Your_Domain.net will be rejected ...omissis 06/22/07 02:10:17:421 -- (3924) Start
virus scan
06/22/07 02:10:17:437 -- (3924) Starting bayesian procedures The 2nd email stops
here The spammer sends several other emails after
these, all are being rejected. On the following email, however, your first
recipient that is in the unfiltered list with a "tabsubject" is encountered, see
entry in purple below. There is now a bug with the log entries, as all attempts
so send emails to other recipients for this one single email appear as
"spam-tagged", while in reality they are being rejected. In fact, see the entry
in green after the email has been received by the spammer, showing that only
your unfiltered recipient is being delivered the
email. 06/22/07 02:12:38:703 --
(3924) - EmailTO is not in AuthorizedTOEmail list...
06/22/07 02:12:38:703 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: crougeau@thebodyshop.ca To: dennisg@Your_Domain.net will be rejected 06/22/07 02:12:40:140 -- (3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (182) - Disconnecting 211.138.9.114 06/22/07 02:12:40:140 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: crougeau@thebodyshop.ca To: dennisl@Your_Domain.net will be rejected 06/22/07 02:12:41:140 -- (3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (183) - Disconnecting 211.138.9.114 06/22/07 02:12:41:140 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: crougeau@thebodyshop.ca To: dennys@Your_Domain.net will be rejected 06/22/07 02:12:42:031 -- (3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (184) - Disconnecting 211.138.9.114 06/22/07 02:12:42:031 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: crougeau@thebodyshop.ca To: depothill@Your_Domain.net will be spam-tagged 06/22/07 02:12:43:296 -- (3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (185) - Disconnecting 211.138.9.114 06/22/07 02:12:43:296 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: crougeau@thebodyshop.ca To: destef@Your_Domain.net will be spam-tagged 06/22/07 02:12:44:125 -- (3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (186) - Disconnecting 211.138.9.114 06/22/07 02:12:44:125 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: crougeau@thebodyshop.ca To: developiowa@Your_Domain.net will be spam-tagged 06/22/07 02:12:44:781 -- (3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (187) - Disconnecting 211.138.9.114 06/22/07 02:12:44:781 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: crougeau@thebodyshop.ca To: devriesfarms@Your_Domain.net will be spam-tagged ...omissis 06/22/07 02:13:01:578 --
(3924) - EmailTO is not in AuthorizedTOEmail list...
06/22/07 02:13:01:578 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: crougeau@thebodyshop.ca To: dianek@Your_Domain.net will be spam-tagged 06/22/07 02:13:03:515 -- (3924) Start virus scan 06/22/07 02:13:03:531 -- (3924) Starting queueing procedures 06/22/07 02:13:03:531 --
(3924) Info - some recipients were in the WhitelistedEmailsTO list. Email will
be split so they receive it while the others will not
06/22/07 02:13:03:531 -- (3924) EMail from crougeau@thebodyshop.ca to depothill@Your_Domain.net was queued. Size: 1 KB, 1024 bytes Now a bug in SpamFilter kicks in. The spammer
sends yet other emails within this same SMTP session. Even though the recipients
are not unfiltered, the bug is causing the spam-tagged recipient in the previous
email to be carry over the "spam-tagged" flag to all subsequent emails as well.
Unlike the above case, this is not a bug in logging, it's actually a bug that
causes the delivery of such emails to all subsequent recipients. We're woking on
a fix...
06/22/07 02:13:05:812 --
(3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (201) - Disconnecting
211.138.9.114
06/22/07 02:13:05:812 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: contacto@particuladigital.com To: dickelduit@Your_Domain.net will be spam-tagged 06/22/07 02:13:06:796 -- (3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (202) - Disconnecting 211.138.9.114 06/22/07 02:13:06:796 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: contacto@particuladigital.com To: dieseldoc@Your_Domain.net will be spam-tagged 06/22/07 02:13:07:843 -- (3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (203) - Disconnecting 211.138.9.114 06/22/07 02:13:07:843 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: contacto@particuladigital.com To: dingus@Your_Domain.net will be spam-tagged 06/22/07 02:13:08:796 -- (3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (204) - Disconnecting 211.138.9.114 06/22/07 02:13:08:796 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: contacto@particuladigital.com To: dirvin@Your_Domain.net will be spam-tagged 06/22/07 02:13:09:812 -- (3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (205) - Disconnecting 211.138.9.114 06/22/07 02:13:09:812 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: contacto@particuladigital.com To: dixie@Your_Domain.net will be spam-tagged 06/22/07 02:13:10:796 -- (3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (206) - Disconnecting 211.138.9.114 06/22/07 02:13:10:796 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: contacto@particuladigital.com To: djdalbey@Your_Domain.net will be spam-tagged 06/22/07 02:13:11:640 -- (3924) Exceeded maximum number of RCPT TO (207) - Disconnecting 211.138.9.114 06/22/07 02:13:11:640 -- (3924) 211.138.9.114 - Mail from: contacto@particuladigital.com To: djdavis@Your_Domain.net will be spam-tagged ....omissis 06/22/07 02:13:23:750 --
(3924) Start virus scan 06/22/07 02:13:23:765 -- (3924) Starting queueing procedures 06/22/07 02:13:23:765 -- (3924) EMail from contacto@particuladigital.com to "dickelduit@Your_Domain.net, dieseldoc@Your_Domain.net, dingus@Your_Domain.net, dirvin@Your_Domain.net, dixie@Your_Domain.net, djdalbey@Your_Domain.net, djdavis@Your_Domain.net, djharms@Your_Domain.net, djmars@Your_Domain.net, djminor@Your_Domain.net, djshepherd@Your_Domain.net, djthorn@Your_Domain.net, djwhitetiger@Your_Domain.net, dkmarlee@Your_Domain.net, dknoch@Your_Domain.net, dkresh@Your_Domain.net, dlantz@Your_Domain.net, dllauer@Your_Domain.net, dlmcbride@Your_Domain.net, dlmurdock@Your_Domain.net" was queued. Size: 1 KB, 1024 bytes |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.