Support for rfc 1891 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
ImInAfrica ![]() Groupie ![]() ![]() Joined: 27 June 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 60 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 03 November 2010 at 6:29pm |
I noticed SF doesn't support rfc 1891 (Delivery Status Notifications or DSN)
Is this something in the works? Thanks. |
|
![]() |
|
LogSat ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sorry, we have no plans to implement DSN in SpamFilter at the time.
|
|
![]() |
|
ImInAfrica ![]() Groupie ![]() ![]() Joined: 27 June 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 60 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Roberto, could you shed some light on whether SpamFilter will pass the DSN parameters over to the next mail server?
|
|
![]() |
|
LogSat ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sure. SpamFilter does not advertise the "DSN" parameter in the EHLO response, which would tell the remote server that DSN is not supported. Should the remote SMTP server still send DSN-related parameters in the RCPT TO command even if they are unsupported, SpamFilter will ignore them and will not pass them on to the destination SMTP server.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.188 seconds.