black.uribl.com and the SURBL filter |
Post Reply |
Author | |
gillonba
Newbie Joined: 30 April 2008 Status: Offline Points: 33 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 27 March 2013 at 2:39pm |
Recently we noticed that a number of e-mails are being rejected with a message looking something like this:
03/27/13 11:28:50:746 -- (4900) SURBL: w3.org - 521 A URL in the email is Blacklisted by SURBL: black.uribl.com. Queries from 8.0.10.9 are restricted due to high volume. See http://uribl.com/about.shtml#abuse. Emails blocked due to this response are done so incorrectly. Please fix your implementation. -- Note that the IP address 8.0.10.9 is NOT ours. I have seen IPs from all over the 8.0.10.* and 8.0.11.* block. Our SURBL Servers list contains both black.uribl.com and multi.surbl.org . I believe that removing black.uribl.com is likely to resolve the issue, but I was wondering a) has anyone else seen anything like this lately b) what other servers are you using c) (for logsat) Is there a way to NOT mark these e-mails as spam? The message implies that this is probably a false positive after all Thanks!
|
|
yapadu
Senior Member Joined: 12 May 2005 Status: Offline Points: 297 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The ipaddress 8.0.10.9 will be the IP address of your DNS server. Your DNS server makes the requests to uribl.com, so it is not spamfilter that directly does it.
You can fix the problem by: 1) Doing your own DNS requests (you could install a DNS server on the same machine as spamfilter and use that). 2) You can remove the lookup forblack.uribl.com from the SURBL server lookup under the list of black lists. |
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
I am a user of SF, not an employee. Use any advice offered at your own risk. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.184 seconds.