Do you have any Keywords suggestions fo me? |
Post Reply |
Author | ||||||||||||||
dcook
Senior Member Joined: 31 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 174 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 24 April 2003 at 11:07pm |
|||||||||||||
I am looking for suggestions on filtering by key word. If you have learned on how to eliminate some false positives I would apprecaite your thoughts. I have been trying to filter out some sexual content by key word. I thought it only triggered on complete words but today it blocked mail when it received a partial match. For example if I had an entry as: I would get matches on "marke" or "sammy". Is there a way to qualify partail or whole word filtering? Also any suggestions on how I can help reduce false positives in filtering? Thanks - Dwight
|
||||||||||||||
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||||||
Dwight, On our end we try to minimize false positives by ensuring we have more than one keyword on a single line. Remember that in order to cause a reject, all keywords on a single line need to be present in the message. If you only have a single word, as in "mark" in your keywords, any messages that contain that word will be rejected. I'm including below the excerpt from the readme file that talks about keywords. Roberto Franceschetti Keywords Filter - You can check email content and headers for specific keyword and/or phrases. If found, the email is rejected. If the keyword file does not exist it will be created. The file is reloaded every minute. The contents of the file will be loaded in the memo box, allowing you to make changes to the file. The rules are as follows:
|
||||||||||||||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.