Spam tagging Multi-Recipient emails incorrectly |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
StevenJohns 
Senior Member 
Joined: 03 August 2006 Status: Offline Points: 119 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Spam tagging Multi-Recipient emails incorrectlyPosted: 10 January 2008 at 3:55pm |
|
Hi Roberto, I have periodically been contacted by clients who say that they are "missing" emails which should have arrived, so I thought I'd do some investigations. It turns out that it appears to be an issue regarding SF's handling of multi-recipient emails when using the AuthorisedToEmail list. I use SF 3.5.4.718 and have it configured to tag spam in the header and forward the email to an internal server for further processing. If an email is sent to multiple recipients within the same domain, i.e. user1@here.com and user99@here.com then these arrive as a single email with multiple recipients (as it should). Now, if one of the email addresses is spelt incorrecly (as in a typo) then that email address is not in the AuthorisedToEmail list and therefore SF tags the email as spam and delivers it to our internal server. Our internal server looks at the header that SF injects which reports the whole email as spam, rather than delivering it to the recipients who are in the AuthorisedToEmail list. Obviously, this email is a legitimate email for the recipients in the AuthorisedToEmail list and should be delievered as such. Is there and way that SF can split the email per recipient so that legit emails get delivered but the mis-spelt email gets tagged??? Your thoughts on how to fix this would be much appreciated. I have attached a protion of the logfile so that you can see what is happening. 01/10/08 20:32:33:077 -- (13984) Connection from: 65.54.246.228 - Originating country : United States
01/10/08 20:32:33:780 -- (13984) Received MAIL FROM: <xxx@hotmail.com> 01/10/08 20:32:33:936 -- (13984) Received RCPT TO: steve@here.com 01/10/08 20:32:34:014 -- (13984) Resolving 65.54.246.228 - bay0-omc3-s28.bay0.hotmail.com 01/10/08 20:32:34:233 -- (13984) found SPF record for spf-a.hotmail.com: v=spf1 ip4:209.240.192.0/19 ip4:65.52.0.0/14 ip4:131.107.0.0/16 ip4:157.54.0.0/15 ip4:157.56.0.0/14 ip4:157.60.0.0/16 ip4:167.220.0.0/16 ip4:204.79.135.0/24 ip4:204.79.188.0/24 ip4:204.79.252.0/24 ip4:207.46.0.0/16 ip4:199.2.137.0/24 ~all 01/10/08 20:32:34:233 -- (13984) - SPF analysis for spf-a.hotmail.com done: - pass 01/10/08 20:32:34:233 -- (13984) - SPF analysis for hotmail.com done: - pass 01/10/08 20:32:34:233 -- (13984) Mail from: xxx@hotmail.com 01/10/08 20:32:34:233 -- (13984) SPF query result: pass 01/10/08 20:32:34:233 -- (13984) SPF query result: pass 01/10/08 20:32:34:233 -- (13984) found SPF record for hotmail.com: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com include:spf-c.hotmail.com include:spf-d.hotmail.com ~all 01/10/08 20:32:34:874 -- (13984) - MAPS search done... 01/10/08 20:32:34:874 -- (13984) RCPT TO: steve@here.com accepted 01/10/08 20:32:35:030 -- (13984) Received RCPT TO: paterick@here.com 01/10/08 20:32:35:030 -- (13984) 65.54.246.228 - Mail from: xxx@hotmail.com To: paterick@here.com will be spam-tagged 01/10/08 20:32:35:030 -- (13984) - EmailTO is not in AuthorizedTOEmail list... 01/10/08 20:32:35:358 -- (13984) Starting queueing procedures 01/10/08 20:32:35:358 -- (13984) EMail from tnc_stevejohns@hotmail.com to "steve@here.com, paterick@here.com" was queued. Size: 1 KB, 1024 bytes 01/10/08 20:32:35:358 -- (13984) Starting bayesian procedures 01/10/08 20:32:35:374 -- (1560) Sending email from xxx@hotmail.com to steve@here.com, paterick@here.com -- 01/10/08 20:32:35:389 -- (3036) Time to add Msg to Bayes corpus:0 01/10/08 20:32:35:577 -- (13984) Blacklist cache - Added 65.54.246.228 to limbo 01/10/08 20:32:35:655 -- (1560) EMail from xxx@hotmail.com to steve@here.com, paterick@here.com -- was forwarded to 127.0.0.1:999 Edited by StevenJohns - 10 January 2008 at 3:57pm |
|
 |
|
|
LogSat
Admin Group 
Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 January 2008 at 9:56pm |
|
Steven,
If SpamFilter is configured to "tag and deliver", then it is expected that SpamFilter will forward all emails to destination. Without the "tag" option, in the case you described, SpamFilter would have delivered the email to valid recipients (discarding the invalid ones). SpamFilter would also have output an error message to the sender, instead of accepting the email, notifying them of which recipients were rejected. This causes the remote server to send an NDR to the sender, who would have then been notified of the problem with a non-deliverable error. In your case, if an email is tagged, it's passed on "as-is" to your server with the header that identifies it as spam because of the invalid addresses. SpamFilter is not able to take that single email with multiple recipients, and then "split" it in two, sending one addressed to the invalid recipients with the spam header, and sending another to the remaining recipients without the spam headers. I'm afraid there won't be much we can do here... The "tag and deliver" option is not simple to handle, as it wll cause SpamFilter to deliver all emails as they are received, optionally adding spam tags in them to identify them as such. In cases where there are multiple recipients and differen rules apply to them (as in the Authorized TO list), there can only be one tag for the email - either it's spam or it's not. |
|
|
|
Topic Options|
Post Reply
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.