SPF return unknown |
Post Reply |
Author | |
vbourbeau
Newbie Joined: 14 April 2010 Status: Offline Points: 19 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 05 October 2010 at 2:23pm |
Hi
Lot of spam pass spamfilter and when I look in log the SPF result return "unknown". What mean this result?
The spam is clearly not the domain owners. Example: e-cards@hallmark.com with 65.166.169.23
|
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
SpamFilter will return an "unknown" if the SPF record is malformed, and will skip the SPF filter check to avoid blocking valid emails.
As a side-note, in your specific example, hallmark.com does indeed have what appears as an improperly formatted SPF record, since it contains two v=spf1 mechanisms: hallmark.com. 1 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:208.1.139.0/24 ip4:129.33.92.0/24 ip4:65.116.50.141 ip4:65.116.50.144 ip4:65.116.50.142 ip4:65.116.50.143 ip4:162.94.28.0/24 v=spf1 ip4:209.176.191.124 ip4:209.176.191.121 ip4:209.176.191.123 ip4:209.176.191.122 ip4:193.132.80.20 mx ~all" while this does appear to violate the SPF RFC, we do see that the online verifier for openspf.org themselves marks that SPF record as legitimate. Due to this, we've just uploaded int he registered user area an updated build of SpamFilter (4.2.4.836) that ignores the duplicate v=spf1 mechanisms and continues to validate the remaining of the SPF record for further analysis.
|
|
vbourbeau
Newbie Joined: 14 April 2010 Status: Offline Points: 19 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
ok ...
If I understand well, wise spamer can use domain name who don't respect the SPF RFC and bypass most of the SPF rules.
|
|
yapadu
Senior Member Joined: 12 May 2005 Status: Offline Points: 297 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes a smart spammer will not pick a domain with valid SPF rules, a much higher % of spam will be stopped when a domain publishes SPF.
By publishing SPF records the domain owner is protecting themselves from spammers trying to forge email from their domain. It is almost like a lock on a bike or house. Just because you have a lock does not mean you can't get broken into but a thief is probably just going to hit the house next door that does not have an alarm. Thanks for the new release Roberto, a couple of nice new additions in there! |
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
I am a user of SF, not an employee. Use any advice offered at your own risk. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.234 seconds.