prvs= overiding white list |
Post Reply |
Author | |
JeffHildebrand
Newbie Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 15 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 01 November 2010 at 12:47pm |
We have a company that seems to be using a form of Bounce Address Tag Validation that keeps getting blocked. I have tried adding the domain to the white list but the emails are continuing to be blocked? The From fields is in the form of
prvs=59176D4360=username@domainname.com with the prvs=###= changing each time.
Is there anything else I can try to prevent the emails from getting blocked?
|
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jeff,
SpamFilter does not look at the "From:" header when handling sender's addresses, as this is just a header, not the real sender's address. SpamFilter instead acts upon the address specified in the "RCPT TO" SMTP command. This address is recorded in the "X-SF-RX-Return-Path" header that is added to the email by SpamFilter, and which will usually also match the email address specified in the "Return-Path" header. When examining the sender's address in order to whitelist them, you will need to look at this "RCPT TO" address, not the one in the "From:" header.
|
|
Thermo
Newbie Joined: 10 July 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 25 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My routine for handling this after releasing one from quarantine is to wildcard the sender in the AutoWhiteListForceDelivery.txt file. I open the file, do a find (CTRL+F), search term is prvs and then I wildcard the address up to the username.
This prvs=59176D4360=username@domainname.com|user@ourcompany.com Becomes this *username@domainname.com|user@ourcompany.com |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.