DNS requests |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
mikek ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 February 2005 Location: Switzerland Status: Offline Points: 133 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 01 September 2006 at 9:33am |
Does SF cache the DNS replies it gets? If not, would it be advisable to install a (cache-only) dns server on the same machine as SF to cut down on network traffic?
|
|
![]() |
|
LogSat ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4105 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
SpamFilter does not cache DNS replies. However...
If an IP address is sending spam, after a few emails get caught within a short period of time, the IP will be added to a temporary local IP blacklist cache (if this filter is enabled), and any further connections will be immediately rejected. |
|
![]() |
|
mikek ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 February 2005 Location: Switzerland Status: Offline Points: 133 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes I'm aware of that function...
So you would say installing a cache-only dns server on the machine would help? A ham message goes through a lot of tests - and quite a few of them are DNS based, so I would expect a cut down of external DNS requests... What do you think? Should I try? |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.445 seconds.