Updated Filter order |
Post Reply |
Author | |
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 17 May 2005 at 11:03pm |
We have moved the "official" filter order to a new standalone post at: =======================
Edited by LogSat - 31 July 2009 at 10:04am |
|
WebGuyz
Senior Member Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 348 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Where would the new IP Cache Black List you were talking about fit into the filter order? I am going nuts trying trying to think of a way to stop the 24x7 dictionary attacks that are hitting my mail server (yes, I use AuthorizedTo list extensivley). I can write a script to gather all the IP's of the rejected maurauders, but there is no SF file to stick them since in the order list the AuthorizedTo check comes after the Whitelist check and before the Block IP list. There would have to be a list that was checked upon connection for the IP address and if it was in the cache black list be stopped before the first whitelist check was ever performed. Is that what the new blacklist you mentioned recently going to do? My SF machine is getting pounded, but that means my regular mailserver gets to go about its business as usual and everyone is happy so SF is really doing a great job for me. Thanks Roberto! |
|
http://www.webguyz.net
|
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
We're still not 100% sure, but so far it looks as if it's going to be
the 1st in the list, so that if the remote IP is in the blacklist
cache, it won't even be allowed to connect. This should greatly reduce
the strain on the Spam Filter server, but will have the downside of the
attempted email to not even being quarantined. But as this is a
"repeated offender", the first few email attempts have already been
quarantined, so we do not think this will be so bad.
|
|
WebGuyz
Senior Member Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 348 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Great! Looking forward to this feature. These mail harvesters really p*ss me off. Tired of daily log files > 40 meg filled with AuthorizedTo rejects.
|
|
http://www.webguyz.net
|
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
We have moved the "official" filter order to a new standalone post at:
Edited by LogSat - 31 July 2009 at 10:04am |
|
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Roberto, Is there a way for users to customize the filter order? For instance, I would prefer that the Keywords blacklist fires before the MAPS check, since I am not quarantining spam flagged due to keywords, but I am quarantining spam flagged due to MAPS. I've found that a lot of the messages in quarantine have the keywords that I've blacklisted, and if the keywords filter would fire first, I would have less email to sift through in the quarantine list. |
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Customizing the filtering order is a rather complex update, and we've always been hesitant in implementing it do to the problems it may cause. SpamFilter is optimized for speed and the low number of resources used, and part of this is due to the way the various filters are employed. For example, the MAPS check is performed very soon after a new incoming connection is detected, before the email's contents are received. This allows SpamFilter to decide if an email is spam even before the actual content is received and analyzed, which can be very cumbersome (CPU-wise) for a server. If the order of these filters is reversed, every single email will have to be fully received before and analyzed any of the DNS-based tests can be applied. If your keyword file is large, this can cause the required server's resources to increase by 10x-100x...
|
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
We have moved the "official" filter order to a new standalone post at: As of SpamFilter ISP version 3.0.1.553, following is the updated order of the filters. In red are the blacklists, in green the whitelists:
Edited by LogSat - 31 July 2009 at 10:05am |
|
mikek
Senior Member Joined: 22 February 2005 Location: Switzerland Status: Offline Points: 133 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Read the list, but am still unsure in my case:
I'm trying to take some load off my main smtp server and want to route domains through spamfilter although the customer does not want any spam filtering (yes, those still exist...) Anyway, I'm using the "Authorized TO EMails" List, which is generated by script off the main mail server. Now I was thinking about adding those domains which do not want spamfiltering to the "Unfiltered Emails" (with :tag), but as I found out until now, then the "Authorized TO EMails" does not get checked and all emails get forwarded to the main smtp server, not only those with valid EMail addresses (which would be my goal - filter out viruses and invalid email addresses on the spamfilter server and forward everything else). Any possibility to achieve this? Regards, Mike |
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Sorry Mike. As the list states, the "Unfiltered emails" has a higher priority than the "not in Authorized TO". Thus as soon as the email is whitelisted, all other tests are skipped (except the antivirus one).
|
|
mikek
Senior Member Joined: 22 February 2005 Location: Switzerland Status: Offline Points: 133 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
OK, so i would have to add each email address separately in the "Unfiltered emails" list with a :tag option, then it would work. I could write a script to do that. Do you think performance could be an issue with this workaround?
|
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
We have moved the "official" filter order to a new standalone post at: As of SpamFilter ISP version 4.0.0.766, following is the updated order of the filters. In red are the blacklists, in green the whitelists:
Edited by LogSat - 31 July 2009 at 10:11am |
|
dcook
Senior Member Joined: 31 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 174 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Does that mean that we can't whitelist a sender to avoid the greylist?
I have a client that is not getting some mails and if the client is rejected by the greylist it appears whitelisting will not help?
|
|
Dwight
www.vividmix.com |
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
That is correct. Please do note that the greylist will only delay the reception of the first email ever sent by a specific server. Once that email has been received (because the remote SMTP server has retried sending it), the IP will always be allowed to pass the greylist filter in the future.
If really necessary (but there has not been a need for anyone to do this yet...), you can manually add IPs to the greylist files in the \SpamFilter\domains\GreyListAllowed.txt file (which requires stopping/restarting SpamFilter for it to be reloaded). |
|
Desperado
Senior Member Joined: 27 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1143 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Roberto,
I actually came up with one issue which also happened with sending to Yahoo and I am not sure there is any real answer. Gammadyne, (a semi-mass mailer), totally chokes when it hits any grey-listing server including SpamFilter and Yahoo. I have contacted their Tech Support on this problem and have not yet heard back. It also happens when I stupidly forget to add the Gammadyne server (on our network) to the donothoneypot list and the IP get's put in the BlackList Cache. It seems that the SMTP engine just doesn't want to disconnect and kill it's own thread it it gets a disconnect it was not expecting. This is NOT a SpamFilter issue. Just thought I would warn folks if they use direct SMTP mailers to send notices to their internal users.
|
|
The Desperado
Dan Seligmann. Work: http://www.mags.net Personal: http://www.desperado.com |
|
kitti
Newbie Joined: 26 September 2006 Location: Thailand Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Roberto
Good day Roberto. Is it possible to include updated filter order in the help file? It's very hard to find in support forum, it's take alot of time to find it when I look for. Many thanks Kitti J |
|
From Siam
|
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Very valid point. We've just updated the documentation, and it will be included in the next release of SpamFilter.
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.244 seconds.