greylisting results |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
Stupid ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 28 November 2005 Status: Offline Points: 127 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 29 January 2008 at 11:24am |
I think greylisting is the best thing since the slice of bread.
Here's a summary on the amount of mesgs we quarantined before and after we implemented greylisting: 1/28/2008 Total 1341 1/27/2008 Total 1165 1/26/2008 Total 1089 1/25/2008 Total 1463 1/24/2008 Total 2015 1/23/2008 Total 882 changed to greylisting 1/19/2008 Total 7254 1/18/2008 Total 9315 1/17/2008 Total 6552 1/16/2008 Total 5364 1/15/2008 Total 5540 1/14/2008 Total 4690 I am also tracking inbound connections, but don't have any solid number yet. |
|
![]() |
|
StevenJohns ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 03 August 2006 Status: Offline Points: 119 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I love greylisting.....Here are our results for this month. As you can see, we implemented greylisting on Friday 11th Jan.
Not only has the number of spam emails dropped, but the number of virus emails is significantly lower. All in all, this has reduced the load on our SF machine and I have yet to have a complaint from any user !!!!!
Total Good Spam Virus
2008-01-01 Tuesday 4421 64 4280 77
2008-01-02 Wednesday 4545 188 4326 31
2008-01-03 Thursday 4068 254 3750 64
2008-01-04 Friday 5053 230 4724 99
2008-01-05 Saturday 5612 91 5488 33
2008-01-06 Sunday 5510 73 5411 26
2008-01-07 Monday 6136 313 5775 48
2008-01-08 Tuesday 5268 277 4958 33
2008-01-09 Wednesday 5083 269 4804 10
2008-01-10 Thursday 4625 261 4320 44
2008-01-11 Friday 1049 275 772 2
2008-01-12 Saturday 709 77 628 4
2008-01-13 Sunday 673 63 607 3
2008-01-14 Monday 1009 286 720 3
2008-01-15 Tuesday 1041 324 716 1
2008-01-16 Wednesday 669 205 464 0
2008-01-17 Thursday 1136 428 706 2
2008-01-18 Friday 1164 301 863 0
2008-01-19 Saturday 950 87 859 4
2008-01-20 Sunday 933 70 861 2
2008-01-21 Monday 1225 325 890 10
2008-01-22 Tuesday 1294 315 976 3
2008-01-23 Wednesday 1206 280 921 5
2008-01-24 Thursday 1279 360 906 13
2008-01-25 Friday 1117 254 858 5
2008-01-26 Saturday 977 77 897 3
2008-01-27 Sunday 767 83 681 3
2008-01-28 Monday 1276 323 950 3
2008-01-29 Tuesday 1217 335 880 2
2008-01-30 Wednesday 760 190 569 1
|
|
![]() |
|
IKILLSPAM1 ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 02 May 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 70 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Guys your figures are good but nothing compared to some of the other users in here.
I dont consider my operation large by any means, but we had up around 98,000 in quarantine prior to greylisting. We now are around 28,000. So yes its a huge decrease and I would have never guessed it to be this large. It shows that spammers can be stopped drastically with such an easy implementation.
|
|
![]() |
|
Desperado ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 27 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1143 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I will chime in. We dropped for 1.2 million to about 300K. Really reduced the load on the server by a huge amount!
|
|
The Desperado
Dan Seligmann. Work: http://www.mags.net Personal: http://www.desperado.com |
|
![]() |
|
mbrusl ![]() Groupie ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 December 2005 Location: Thunder Bay Ont Status: Offline Points: 61 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have to admit that I'm happy to see this implimented finally. As a AntiSpam Service, we get plenty of spam hitting our servers and this greylisting has significantly dropped our load off of the server by more than two thirds. Good going SF team for getting this built in. A great deal of the spam that was coming in was drive by hits and now, they have to make a second attempt within a certain time to get their junk to be even seen by the rest of SF filters.
Michael |
|
Michael
support@spacequad.com If blocked, use spacequad@hotmail.com Spacequad Internet Services Spacequad AntiSpam Services Thunder Bay, Ontario -------------------------------------------------- |
|
![]() |
|
Simone ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 06 July 2005 Status: Offline Points: 42 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
quarantined email dropped down to 33% and i had NO ONE with email lost for this filter.
I'm having problems with SFDC filter that is too aggrssive, i'm using 15 as network reliability, which number are you using? With 15 it is stopping always email with only subject and attachment... Do you have the same problem? |
|
![]() |
|
kspare ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 334 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We started at about 300k in the quaruntine, we're not sitting between 25,000 to 30,000. The impact of this filter is HUGE!
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.