Aggression against free email services |
Post Reply |
Author | |
yapadu
Senior Member Joined: 12 May 2005 Status: Offline Points: 297 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 20 April 2010 at 9:24am |
Is it just me, or does it seem like the SFDB is being particularity aggressive against hotmail, msn, yahoo & gmail recently? I can't believe the number of false positives against these free email domains.
I know it is an automated system, but wow! We are currently sitting at more than 5 million IP's in the database. |
|
dotme
Newbie Joined: 27 October 2008 Status: Offline Points: 20 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'm seeing it too. Getting a few calls from customers asking why so many emails from those domains are hitting a wall due to the SFDB. I might try increasing the matches threshhold and see if that loosens things up a bit.
|
|
Web123
Newbie Joined: 26 January 2005 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 31 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
same here
maybe Roberto has some explanation?
|
|
gillonba
Newbie Joined: 30 April 2008 Status: Offline Points: 33 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Us too. One of our users just about had an aneurysm when some of his incoming mail was blocked and he had to look through his quarantine report, and I got to spend a long weekend at the office sorting things out for everybody
|
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
We saw the same problem today, and did discover an issue with our SFDB database that has been preventing the automatic removal of IPs that were no longer sending spam. As IPs stop sending spam (or the flow of spam greatly decreases), they are automatically removed from the SFDB within 24 hours. This automatic delisting process has not been working correctly for the past 5 days, and has prevented "sanitized" IPs from being delisted.
We have solved the issue with our SFBD web service as of 3PM (EST) today. Our sincere apologies to everyone, we have never had any issues with our SFDB service since its implementation back in 2006 - this is our first failure in over 4 years. Not seeing any failures in the SFDB so long has obviously induced us in being less attentive, and this was a big mistake.
|
|
yapadu
Senior Member Joined: 12 May 2005 Status: Offline Points: 297 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Geez, glad I mentioned it. I should have realized when something was up. We normally see 60% - 61% of messages being stopped as a result of SFDB. That number has gone up over 70%, I just thought it was working better than normal. Guess I should have started investigating when I noticed that.
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.055 seconds.