Whitelisting using CIDR? |
Post Reply |
Author | |
yapadu
Senior Member Joined: 12 May 2005 Status: Offline Points: 297 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 17 January 2020 at 10:54pm |
I'm trying to do whitelisting by CIDR, like this: 209.85.222.0/16 Doesn't seem to have any impact. I found a VERY old thread where using CIDR was talked about for blacklisting However, I've found nothing about whitelisting using a CIDR. Can anyone confirm, if it is supported or not? Or am I just doing something wrong?
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
I am a user of SF, not an employee. Use any advice offered at your own risk. |
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Sorry yapadu, The CIDR notation is only available in the IP blacklist, not in the whitelist. However... In the IP whitelist you can for example enter this wildcarded entry for the /16 subnet: 192.168.* Note that the above notation will only block 192.168.0.0 --> 192.168.255.255. It will not interfere with substrings (IPs that contain 192.168 in them), for example it will *not* block: 1.192.168.2 |
|
yapadu
Senior Member Joined: 12 May 2005 Status: Offline Points: 297 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Oh, you can use a wildcard a low as the 3rd octet? So these would be valid? 192.168.* 192.168.2* 192.168.12* 192.168.2.* 192.168.2.1* All those would be OK?
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
I am a user of SF, not an employee. Use any advice offered at your own risk. |
|
LogSat
Admin Group Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes correct - it will work even for the first octet (192.*). |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.