Black Lists not working right |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
tk ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 12 June 2003 at 7:44pm |
Here is a nslookup for an IP address:Name: 39.48.236.66.dnsbl.njabl.org
Address: 127.0.0.4nslookup reported this IP address correctly as a source for spam: .4, however spamfilter doesn't block this IP address. You can add dnsbl.njabl.org to your mars server list and try it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Abel ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
tk, Are you using the line: dnsbl.njabl.org, true in your list ? Abel. |
|
![]() |
|
tk ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, of course.
|
|
![]() |
|
tk ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here is another example: 205.235.69.168 Doing a manual (Check if IP in ORBS) returns this IP address as not black listed. Whereas bl.spamcop.net reports:205.235.69.168 listed in bl.spamcop.net. ( 127.0.0.2 )Here is a list of my maps servers:bl.spamcop.net, true
sbl.spamhaus.org, true
relays.osirusoft.com, true
spam.dnsrbl.net, true
dnsbl.njabl.org, true
proxies.relays.monkeys.com, true
dnsbl.sorbs.net,true
|
|
![]() |
|
LogSat ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tk, We tried doing a manual check from SpamFilter's "Check if IP in ORBS", and it correctly reported that it is indeed blacklisted by SpamCop's bl.spamcop.net. In the list of maps server you pasted there is an extra "e" in the true next to spamcop. Is that a type in the posting or in the SpamFilter's list? If it's like that in SpamFilter it will not work... Here's the list you pasted: bl.spamcop.net, true e sbl.spamhaus.org, true relays.osirusoft.com, true spam.dnsrbl.net, true dnsbl.njabl.org, true proxies.relays.monkeys.com, true dnsbl.sorbs.net,true And here's ours for a comparison: bl.spamcop.net, true Roberto Franceschetti |
|
![]() |
|
pcmatt ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 February 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 116 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
TK: I've had the same problems. You probably made a configuration change AFTER the service was started. We always have to reboot our server and then changes to the configuration work fine. This appears to hold true for most any configuration change. -Matt |
|
![]() |
|
tk ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks. I did'nt actually have to reboot just restarted the service and now the black list seems to be working OK. It was odd some IPs even before the restart would appear correctly but some would not.Robert, There were no typos in the list, it had to do with restarting the service. Is this a bug or a requirement?
|
|
![]() |
|
pcmatt ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 February 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 116 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We started with version v1.1.2.122 then upgraded to v1.1.2.124 and are running on W2K Server with SP3 and latest hotfixes. What version are you running and on what platform? I can't restart the service. Thanks, Matt |
|
![]() |
|
tk ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We're running on a NT Server 4.0 SP6. We were trying the .143 beta version but I have never had trouble with restarting the service even on earlier versions.
|
|
![]() |
|
LogSat ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
SpamFilter is designed so that you never have to restart the service to make any changes active. So far you and Matt are the only ones experiencing this problem. I'd definetly call it a bug, and are working with Matt to try to find out what the problem is. If you would like us to access your server to troubleshoot it, please let us know by emailing support@logsat.com Roberto F. |
|
![]() |
|
LogSat ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
FYI, in the new beta .162 we made major improvements in ensuring the service shuts down properly. It looks much more stable than in the current official retail release. Roberto Franceschetti |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.188 seconds.