RBL cache |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
metrotel 
Guest Group 
|
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: RBL cachePosted: 15 May 2003 at 12:43pm |
|
Filtering is working great. I'm interested in performance issues. How high up on the list is RBL cache? A TTL of 24hrs would work for me. On weekends I watch the activity and I see about 50% of the SAPM coming from just a few IP addresses. They are all blacklisted. I was hit with about 20,000 connections from a small number of addresses over a period of less than 24 hours. You could also have a "flush" command to empty the cache. Keep up the good work. Thanks, James Taylor 903-793-1953
|
|
 |
|
|
LogSat
Admin Group 
Joined: 25 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 May 2003 at 10:26pm |
|
It's pretty high. We should have ready within a couple of weeks. Roberto |
|
|
|
|
Desperado
Senior Member 
Joined: 27 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1143 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 May 2003 at 1:18am |
|
Due to our fairly high mail volume, we run our own dnsbl server and use it as a "Proxy" to get answers from the rbl lists we desire. We can the cache on our local DNS server (located on our mail server). Our mail server doesn't know anything about our "real" public DNS servers. We set the ttl to 30 minutes since most spam seem to come in "Bursts". Dan S.
|
|
|
|
Topic Options|
Post Reply
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.148 seconds.